Hoover Institution Archives Firing Line Television Program Collection

FIRING LINE TELEVISION PROGRAM COLLECTION

<< Prev Program Details Next >>

Program Number	FLS118
Title	A Firing Line Debate: Resolved: That Welfare Has Done More Harm than Good
PBS Number	116
Moderator	Kinsley, Michael E., Senior Editor at The New Republic, co-host of CNN's Crossfire
Host	Buckley, William F. (William Frank), 1925-2008.
Guest(s)	1) Buckley, William F. (William Frank), 1925-2008. - For the Affirmative. 2) Murray, Charles A. - For the Affirmative. Social scientist, author of Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980 3) Woodson, Robert L. - For the Affirmative. Founder and President of the National Council for Neighborhood Enterprise 4) Bryant, Wayne R. - For the Affirmative. Democratic New Jersey Assemblyman, author of New Jersey‘s welfare-reform bill 5) Norton, Eleanor Holmes. - For the Negative. Delegate to Congress from the District of Columbia, sometime Chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 6) Greenstein, Robert, 1946- - For the Negative. Executive Director of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities 7) Rangel, Charles B. - For the Negative. Democratic Congressman from New York 8) Piven, Frances Fox. - For the Negative. Professor of Political Science at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, author of Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare
Taped on	Mar 15, 1994 (George Washington University, Wash)
Broadcast Date	Mar 21, 1994
Duration	120 minutes (or hh:mm:ss)
Summary	President Clinton, Mr. Kinsley reminds us, "campaigned on a vow to 'end welfare as we know it.' " Would he be on the Affirmative side in this debate? Mr. Buckley is quick to make a distinction: "We are gathered, my colleagues and I, to contend that welfare has done more harm than good. This is not to say that welfare has done only harm. A useful distinction here is between welfare, which can be an ongoing lifestyle, and relief, which is on the order of the kind of treatment one receives in an emergency room in a hospital." Ms. Norton comes out swinging: "I ask you, is the abused woman who has finally got the gumption to leave the house of abuse more harmed by welfare than if it were not there? Is the divorced woman in transition whose husband will not give her child support more harmed by welfare than not?" The spirited exchange gives some idea of the gulf between the two sides on this issue. Ms. Piven: "Why do you think a poor woman who is raising children surrenders her respect when she gets some support from the government, but that a much better-off woman, also raising children by herself-but with perhaps assets that she got from a divorce settlement-does not surrender her self-respect...." Mr. Woodson: "The difference is, the poor one has to then turn to taxpayers for support, and that's when you get other people involved in your business.... I think it's wrong to absolve people of personal responsibility. That's the kind of patronizing attitude that you get from people who believe that poor people don't have the ability to make decisions for themselves."
Subject Heading(s)	Public welfare -- United States.
Related Document(s)	Type(s): Transcript, news releases, clippings, CVs, source materials, photo Type(s): Transcript Type(s): Research materials Type(s): Transcript Type(s): Transcript (5 copies)

Purchase DVD	Program is unavailable for purchase at this time.
Transcript	Request a transcript

Back to program list.

Hoover's website does not contain complete information on all the library and archives holdings.

Find library and archive holdings via Stanford's Socrates or Searchworks.

Search long descriptions available for most of the larger archival collections via the OAC.